Henry VIII And Louis XIV Essay Research free essay sample

Henry VIII And Louis XIV Essay, Research Paper Henry VIII and Louis XIV Henry VIII and Louis XIV were both work forces whose achievements on a national degree for their several states of England and France were great, but whose really different personal jobs gave them a negative feeling in history. The two leaders had really different opinion manners, but with a few similar subjects throughout. Possibly the best thing to look at first is their very different attitudes toward God and God? s power in monarchy and province. Henry VIII on England grew up as a really strong Catholic, at the insisting of his female parent and male parent. He was known to be? a adult male of day-to-day devotionals, puting an illustration for his people? ( Canon 76 ) . His ain Hagiographas, most particularly a book of Catholicity entitled The Sanctoreum earned him the rubric from Pope Leo III the rubric? Defender of the Faith. We will write a custom essay sample on Henry VIII And Louis XIV Essay Research or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page ? His book had served as an reply to the instructions of Martin Luther, a adult male whose principals Henry subsequently put into consequence in his really ain state, in the Protestant Reformation. France, nevertheless, was a really strongly Catholic state where the Roman church had a great trade of influence. Louis, although supposed non to be a really fastidious devote of the faith, or any faith, took portion in a minor reorganisation of the Roman Catholic Church inside France. It is evident now that Louis fundamentally went along with the reforms dictated by the Catholic Pope in respects to faith. In economic affairs, the two swayers possibly differed even more greatly. Henry was a fastidious economic expert, frequently noticing about the disbursal of things at the royal tribunal, and taking action to hold whatever the latest discourtesy to the exchequer happened to be. Louis, nevertheless, spent abundantly, saving no disbursal for himself or his Lords. His ultimate end was one time once more to do the tribunal of France the centre of manner and art one time once more. He created Versailles, a freak of Baroque art, most of it gilded with pure gold and other cherished metal. It is a straggling state estate with an even more dramatic exterior than interior. Louis bankrupted the Treasury of France through another extrvangance every bit good: his wars. Louis fought four major wars. His great purpose was to do himself supreme in Europe. As a start, he planned to suppress all lands west of the Rhine River. He gained several of import districts, but was ever checked by the confederations that other states formed to oppose him. In the War of Spanish Succession, England took an of import portion in get the better ofing him, taking to animus between the two states and their several swayers. This war, which ended in 1714, left France exhausted and weakened. Both work forces had a common ability to see the goodness in other work forces as royal advisers. Both hired surprisingly intelligent and wise work forces to run their personal businesss for them, possibly Henry even more than Louis XIV. One of Henry? s head advisers is immortalized in Shakespeare? s? The Life and Times of Kind Henry VIII? . Cardinal Wolsey is spoken of at that place as? a adult male such as history had neer yet laid their eyes upon, a adult male who could hold others acquire his ain will enforced? ( Shakespeare 78 ) . Wolsey spent small clip at the British tribunal, but the clip he spent was valuable. He served as head adviser to a immature, freshly crowned, and waxy King Henry. He formed Henry? s thoughts about authorities, spoke for the sovereign in assembly, and reputedly taught Henry everything he knew about economic sciences from an early age. Two other advisers are besides known to history as functioning in Henry? s subsequently life, Thomas Cromwell and Thomas More. Similarly, Louis XIV, in a grade of true mastermind, was wise plenty to appoint person wiser than himself to run the authorities. He had many, and curiously, most of their names have been erased from history. Jean Baptise Colbert, adviser to Louis in his formative old ages as a sovereign, subsequently wrote in prison, ? The adult male was a sap, but would non environ himself with other saps? ( Olivier 178 ) . In their personal lives, the sovereign had a great figure of similarities. Both Henry VIII and Louis XIV were fond of adult females, drink, and argument. Henry is possibly most celebrated for his six married womans, and the bloody ends that most of them came to. Out of six, merely two were non banished, publically executed, or otherwise humiliated. A speedy summation: Katharine Aragon of Spain, Henry? s foremost bride. She was banished from royal position and stripped of her rubric after she failed to bring forth boies and Henry fell in love with a immature lady in waiting named Anne Boleyn. Anne Boleyn: was executed for criminal conversation and charges of witchery. Jane Seymour: recorded in history as the lone married woman Henry genuinely loved. Died a few hebdomads after giving birth to Henry? s much wanted boy. Anne of Clefs: Princess of Germany who was non beautiful in Henry? s eyes, and was sent off. Catherine Howard: Commoner executed for criminal conversation. Catherine Parr: Outlived Henry. Henry jousted in many tourneies until a leg hurt prevented this type of activity. He besides grew rather sick and corpulent in ulterior life, but neer lost his love of athleticss and other athletic activities. Louis XIV liked to watch the tourneies more than he liked to really participate in them. But his lascivious wonts did non differ much from those of his neighbour across the Channel. He was married to Queen Marie Therese, but reportedly had at least ten other kept womans at one clip. He had three kids by his married woman, but purportedly twelve other illicit kids by his kept womans. It was, in fact, some of these personal wonts that led to the ruins of the sovereign. Henry VIII, who had been the great? Defender of the Faith? in his earlier old ages, was in a spot of a quandary. He no longer wanted to be married to his aging married woman, piously Catholic Katharine of Aragon. He was in love with a immature lady named Anne Boleyn. Any Catholic knows that divorce is frowned upon. But in order to get married Anne, Henry needed this divorce. He broke from the Catholic church, and, with the aid of Thomas Cromwell, another top adviser, created the Church of England. Unfortunately, to pass over out all cells of resistance, Henry was forced to destruct many who did non back up this interruption with the Church. Another thing lending to Henry? s ruin was his unwellness. Legend has it that Anne Boleyn? s spirit took retaliation on the 1 who had ordered her executing. It is more likely, harmonizing tomany modern historiographers, that Henry had a virus much like that which his male parent died of. He suffered a painful terminal: invariably coughing up blood, and crippled by a flaring leg hurt. For the last few old ages of his life, he was unable to regulate his state good, and power fled from England. Louis XIV had a really different job. His trouble was merely that he spent more than France could afford. Not merely had the edifice of Versailles badly disabled the Treasury, his excessive disbursement on his assorted kept womans and illicit kids got out of manus. He was to the point, by the terminal of his reign, of puting up a well-found and equipped estate for each of these households. Not merely that, but the Spanish War of Succession badly crippled the exchequer, and Louis neer could genuinely raised the revenue enhancements plenty to cover his love of these? small wars? and adult females. Louis was known in Europe for being the longest reigning male monarch in all of modern history. He kept tribunal at his assorted castles and fought in his wars for about 72 old ages. After his cheif adviser Jean Baptiste Colbert died in 1685, the reign of the Sun King became less canonized. He forced the baronial households to remain at tribunal at Versailles, making the job of absentee landlords for the common mans, who lived in comparative poorness compared to the great luster of Versailles. Louis died bit by bit of disease, and after his reign, political influence in France declined greatly for a figure of old ages. However, France remembers him in a much better manner than history admires Henry the VIII. Both sovereigns suffered troubled lives, and still managed to carry through great things for England and France. Henry VIII raised scientific consciousness and grasp for art that had antecedently been absent from England. Louis Fourteen added a new dimension to the humanistic disciplines such as the universe had neer seen. His reign was known as ranking above all others in art and literature, every bit good as dance. And yet, even today they are remembered for the most portion their weaknesss, Henry for his marital problems and Louis for his economic extravagancies. It might make better to weigh the pros and cons of history alternatively of unsighted judgement on the footing of few facts when thought of Henry VIII and Louis XIV.

Colombia Essays (1223 words) - San Ciro De Acosta, Free Essays

Colombia Essays (1223 words) - San Ciro De Acosta, Free Essays Colombia La situacion de los derechos humanos en Colombia es, sin duda, la peor de America Latina. Las ejecuciones extra-judiciales, la tortura, las desapariciones, las violaciones contra ninos e indigenas han alcanzado en los ultimos anos en proporsiones epidemicas. Voy a hablar de los derechos humanos en respecto al conversaciones del presidente con las guerrillas, la libertad de expresion y de prensa y el Plan Colombia. Colombia es una democracia constitucional multipartidista en la cual los partidos liberales y conservadores han dominado la escena politica durante un largo tiempo. Los ciudadanos colombianos eligieron en 1998 al presidente Andres Pastrana del partido conservador y un cogreso bicameral controlado por el partido liberal en unas elecciones libres, justas y trasparentes, pese a los intentos de intimidacion y fraude de parte de los grupos paramilitares, las guerrillas y los narcotraficantes. Los principales protagonistas fueron las fuerzas de seguridad del gobierno, los grupos paramilitares, la guerrilla y los narcotraficantes, mientras que en otras fueron los grupos paramilitares los que se enfrentaron a la guerrilla, y en otras la guerrilla ataco a los miembros desmovilizados de facciones guerrilleras rivales. Los grupos guerrilleros mas importantes son las Fuerzas Armadas Revolucionarias de Colombia (FARC) y el Ejercito de Liberacion Nacional (ELN). Estan integrados por un numero aproximado de 11.000 a 17.000 combatientes permanentes organizados en mas de 100 grupos semiautonomous. En julio de 1998, el presidente Pastrana se reunio con el lider de las FARC Manuel Marulanda Velez y acepto establecer una zona desmilitarizada en la cual las dos partes pudieran adelantar dialogos directos de paz. En enero, Marulanda no se presento para la inauguracion formal programada de los dialogos de paz en la zona de despeje. El presidente Pastrana y Marulanda se reunieron nuevamente en mayo y acordaron la agenda para las negociaciones formales y los procedimientos a la creacion de una comision internacional de verificacion que se encargaria de garantizar que ambas partes cumplieron con los terminos del despeje. Los grupos paramilitares y guerrilleros perpetraron la gran mayoria de las matanzas politicas y extrajudiciales. En todo el pais, los grupos paramilitares mataron, torturaron y amenazaron a civiles sospechosos para simpatizar con la guerrilla. Tambien las fuerzas paramilitares se disputaron con la guerrilla y participaron directamente en la produccion y el trafico de n arcoticos. Durante este ano, el presidente Pastrana se junto otra vez con Marulanda para hablar del plan Colombia y para alcanzar un proceso de paz. El segundo problema en Colombia es la libertad de expresion y de prensa. La constitucion contempla la libertad de prensa, sin embargo el gobierno respeta en general este derecho en la practica, hubo algunas excepciones significativas. Los periodistas practican regularmente la autocensura a fin de evitar represalia y hostigamiento. Sin embargo, los medios impresos privados publicaron una gama amplia de opiniones politicas y en ocasiones manifestan opiniones duras contra el gobierno sin temor de las represalias administrativas. Todos los ciudadanos tienen derecho a solicitar una mocion de tutela en casos relacionados con la violacion de los derechos constitucionales. Esto le brinda todos las personas y organizaciones, incluidos los medios de comunicacin, un mecanismo para criticar las violaciones de los derechos fundamentales. Por parte tanto de los entes gubernamentales como de los privados. Los periodistas trabajan en general en un clima de amenaza e intimidacion. Debido al temor por su seguridad, los periodistas suelen abstenerse de publicar o sacar a la luz noticias contrarias a los intereses de los grupos paramilitares, guerrilleros o de narcotraficantes. Durante el ano, nueve periodistas murieron a manos de atacantes desconocidos, aunque no todos los asesinatos pudieron atribuirse directamente a su trabajo. Por ejemplo, en el 11 de abril Hernando Moreno locutor de la radio fue asesinado en casa de un amigo. Aunque no estaba trabajando para ningun medio en particular en ese momento, habia escrito algunos informes ocasionales criticando a los grupos paramilitares para el Sur Treinta Dias, periodico local de El Plato, Magdalena. Tambien el gobierno respeta la libertad academica y hubo toda una gama de actividades politicas en las universidades de todo el pais. Sin embargo, los grupos paramilitares y guerrilleros mantienen presencia en muchas universitarias. Tanto los paramilitares como la guerrilla senalaron como blancos de asesinatos politicos a profesores de las escuelas publicas de primaria y secundaria. En 1998, el

Impact of print media Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words

Impact of print media - Essay Example Media can promote democracy. In fact, media can be an important incubator of dissent and principled opposition to the military regime (Tironi and Sunkel 2000). How audience is targeted. A clearly defined target audience is important in any media such as print. Targeting an audience as a concept is best explained by examples. Consider the Alliance for Full Acceptance (AFFA), a social justice organization achieving equality and acceptance for gay, lesbian, transgender and bisexual (GLTB) people ("We are" 2007). For their primary target audience, they have the "moveable middle," or heterosexuals whose opinions can be "moved" toward the positive through education. This group had conducted research beforehand and knew too well that a greater percentage of well educated people, females and higher income people, will be less prejudiced against homosexual people. They also learned that the general heterosexual population is extremely under-educated as regards GLBT people. Finally, they also came to know that heterosexuals are largely unaware of the lack of civil rights GLBT people experience, and are exposed largely to stereotypes and myths about them. Heterosexuals then became their primary target audience. ... Their energy, they decided, is to be saved for those who will listen ("We are" 2007). In targeting audience, therefore, research is needed where time, money, and effort could be used most efficiently. AFFA had to consider if the people who will be exposed to the message are above average in terms of education and income when placing media. If positive, they can become the best target market for change in attitudes about GLBT issues. They had to conduct a survey toward this objective to be able to get reliable data. In some media campaigns, a secondary target audience may also be obtained. The AFFA, for example, has the GLBT community being exposed to their message as secondary target audience, the purpose of which is to instill confidence and self-esteem. The objective of media campaign at times dictates choice of the primary target group. For example, to change sex selective behaviour, the target group should be those who seek the services to determine the sex of the fetus and later to abort it ("Sex Selection" 2007). It was found out that it is not effective to target medical practitioners who supply their services exclusively through mass media. Instead, the young unmarried women are best the target audience as they are the most open to questioning inherited values and behaviors, display the greatest conflict with choices forced upon them, and express discomfort with practices of sex selection. Mostly, they appear to be the most amenable to behaviour change ("Sex Selection 2007). In both instances mentioned here, the common denominator for target audience appears to be those most responsive to behavior change. What research literature says is first considered, then, time, money and effort are spent in planning the most efficient way how

Managing Diversity Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3000 words - 1

Managing Diversity - Essay Example (2008) Managing Diversity; the business case; London; CIPD] In this age of globalization, there is much controversy on the coming together of all kinds of people for a common purpose. Diversity is slowly becoming a common feature in schools, workplaces and communities. Due to this development, a lot of issues crop up such as acceptance of different races and cultures, sexual preferences, educational qualifications and changes in practices previously viewed as established norms. In the workplace, it takes various strategies to facilitate people from various backgrounds to work together towards the same goals. Motivation of people must be one strong quality of a great manager. The concept of diversity has been broadened to include all â€Å"individuals who bring unique perspectives or outlooks to the organization† (Schakelford, 2004, p.53). That means, it not only includes the traditional categories of race and gender, but also people with disabilities, various sexual orientations, and other non-traditional categories considered having â€Å"diversity of thought† or those from different disciplines, college degrees, socio-economic backgrounds, etc. It was Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. who inspired the concept of diversity when he advocated that people should be judged by their character, not by the color of their skin. This propelled lawmakers to come up with laws that provide equal opportunity to all (Mor Barak, 2000). These laws have been designed protect anyone from being discriminated against by reason of sex, marital status, ethnic or national origin, color, race, nationality, age, disability, religion, and differing terms of employment, including pay for jobs of equal value. â€Å"Equal opportunity† is a means by which a person receives equal access in society. â€Å"Equal opportunities approach† is premised on the principle that all people can avail of

Madame Bovary And The Death Of Ivan Ilych Essay Example for Free

Madame Bovary And The Death Of Ivan Ilych Essay What is the nature of man? Gustave Flaubert’s Madame Bovary and Leo Tolstoy’s The Death of Ivan Ilych portray not only a glimpse of what man’s nature is, but also in so doing provide a criticism of it. Both works look into the life of people who want more out of life, and yet ironically what they desire only adds shallowness and not meaning to their existence. Whereas Flaubert’s Madam Bovary shows the depressing end of a woman consumed by passions, Tolstoy gives hope with a dying man’s last days where he gets an epiphany of what the nature of man should be. Emma is Madame Bovary, a young woman who lived in her world of romantic fantasy. She came from the country and read romantic novels when she was in the convent, and believed in earnest that love and marriage will make her happy. But after marrying a simple-minded and incompetent doctor Charles, she grows disillusioned as she sinks in the routine activities of daily life. She wanted romance, passion, excitement, and although her husband loves her and adores her, she wanted more. She wanted the latest trends in fashion and she felt that she was born unjustly to a lower class than was supposed to be for her, the aristocrat. But Emma does nothing to earn the admiration or the respect of the people she admired: she can copy their outward mannerism and clothes, but she does not have the refinement or the manners to be truly aristocratic. She merely believes in her fantasy world where the aristocrats live in luxury and a life of excitement. She was ambitious, but did not have any means to acquire her material cravings but for using her beauty and body. She gets into extramarital affairs because she finds her married life dull, even when she gives birth to a daughter. She does not take care of her daughter because she wanted a boy, and instead romps off with Rodolphe Boulanger, and does not care what other people say. She is oftentimes indiscreet and cares not of her reputation or her husband’s. Emma is self-centered and she had a sense of entitlement and superiority which had no basis but drove her to act without a thought to the consequences of her actions. She is, in a way, always likening herself to playing a role that sparks her imagination at the moment: a young woman being married to a foreign doctor, a middle class with a noble’s spirit, a bored wife having an affair, a lover, a woman of rich tastes. She could not accept that her reality was the norm and that her fantasies were exaggerated, dramatic ideals. When she was young she wanted the same romance she read in her romantic novels. When she became exposed to the high society at the ball she wanted to become like them. When she saw the melodramatic opera â€Å"Lucia de Lammemoor† she adopts the character and like her commits suicide. She drove herself to debt by buying expensive items which she sometimes gave as gifts to her lovers even when she had no means of paying for these in the first place. She signed promissory notes even when she did not understand them because the merchant Lheureux played with her fantasy that she was meant for the finest things in life. When her first lover leaves her, she is distraught and falls gravely ill. With her second affair she acts as the man, covering the costs for the affair and taking charge of where, when, and how they will meet. Her debts pile up as she purchases more and more to fill the gaping hole in her being. She believed she needed passion and excitement, but it seems that what she really needed was purpose and direction, for her life held no meaning. Her innocent tendency towards romance is transformed into full blown moral corruption as she was unable to hold herself together and keep her urges and desires under control. Emma is not productive, she has no desire to improve herself or her skills, and she does not nurture her relationships with her husband, her daughter, not even with her lovers. She just saw them as means of escape from her dull life, and when they fall short of her expectations she just drops them. When the consequences of her actions finally catch up on her and her world becomes smaller and smaller, she decides to play a role – that of a tragic heroine and kills herself with swallowing arsenic. She could not face up to the trouble that she has caused and decides to escape rather than take responsibility as she could not imagine a life of poverty and shame – although her whole life she was never wealthy and she lived a scandalous life with her known affairs. Up until then she saw her life differently – believed she had wealth, pride and breeding because that was what she wanted, but sadly these did not bring her the happiness she sought. Emma had a good life but was not able to appreciate it with her preoccupation with the things she did not have. By focusing her energies on her fantasies of wealth and romance she failed to live her life to the fullest, and for the most part it could be said that she was living in a dream and when she woke to find herself in the gravity of her real life situation, she killed herself to escape, but there was no going back to her fantasy world, and no redemption as even after her death her husband discovers her infidelity which kills him and her daughter sent off to work on a cotton mill. In her, we see the nature of man as ruled by emotions, desires and appetites, without caution or control, without compassion to others. Emma was not able to see and recognize the humanity in her, all the time she was acting out, even her motherly functions, her martyr facade. She never truly enjoyed life because she never saw anything and anyone beyond their appearances, and never learned to appreciate the little things that make life worthwhile. The theme of life and death is also examined in Leo Tolstoy’s The Death of Ivan Ilych, where he uses the characters to critique the artificial life that people live in society characterized by materialism and shallowness. Tolstoy puts forward a picture of society with striking honesty and insight: individuals do not behave as individuals but rather aspire to be like everybody else, trying to live a correct life as appropriated by norms, striving to have a comfortable life accentuated with material wealth even if their spiritual life and human relationships are dry and empty. With his narrative, Tolstoy then poses the question of what is important in life, how life should be led, and ultimately, how important life is and how people take it for granted by deluding themselves into believing they are exempt from death. Most of the characters in the story are portrayed as materialistic social climbers, who equated material wealth and position in society as determinants of success and happiness. Ivan, his wife and daughter, his supposed friends, all troubled themselves with appearances – they were preoccupied with proper decorum and attires, of looking well off, of having power over others. But these are all temporal, for these things do not really matter in the face of death. Ivan finds out that what is important is living one’s life according to one’s own vindication, not blindly following trends in society which results in a shallow, routine, meaningless life. He belatedly understood that empathy and recognizing the individual as an individual with thoughts and emotions rather than as subjects with mere faces is what mattered in life, that to live humanly is what gives life its meaning. Only Gerasim and his son are the ones in the story that have empathy and humanity in them – in Gerasim it is made obvious by his understanding that everybody, regardless of position or appearance, are all equal, with the same fate waiting for them in the end, especially when he said, â€Å"We shall all of us die, so why should I grudge a little trouble? †. The son, on the other hand, is the only one in Ivan household who showed any feelings for his dying father – he took his father’s hand and kissed it while crying. This can be taken as the boy was young; he was still innocent and not yet tainted with the demands of society. Ivan himself was dissatisfied with the boy because he behaved differently from him, his wife and daughter, but in his last days it was his son who showed him that there is a human soul in the world who regarded his life important. Also, this depiction of the innocence in childhood is mirrored in Ivan’s experiences: the only times he felt truly alive was when he was a boy, before he went to Law School. Being assimilated into society, he found that he trapped himself into a prison of standards, and lived a largely artificial life. Tolstoy showed that an artificial life is characterized by materialism and social climbing. At the beginning of the story, we find Ivan dead but his friends were chiefly concerned with the position that he will be vacating, the promotions and changes in the workplace and what they have to gain from it, all the while denying to themselves that they too will end up like Ivan sooner or later, that they will die eventually. They act as though they could live forever and concern themselves with the trivial everyday things. Even in his wake, his friends put a show of grievance because it was what was required of â€Å"friends†, but were more interested in playing bridge. They did not see the inevitability of death and suffering, of the hollowness of their lives. Peter Ivanovich, Ivan’s perceived closest friend, somehow felt disturbed and concerned, but rushed to quell these feelings because he reasoned he was alive and Ivan dead and there should be no reason to â€Å"hinder their spending the evening agreeably†. When he was still alive, Ivan himself saw how he had lived superficially in the way his doctors treated him, as though he was some subject whose sentence they hold in their hands, his life holding no real importance or meaning to the doctors. What mattered to the doctors was their perception of themselves that they feel important and significant by virtue of their occupation; that is what gave them satisfaction and purpose. Ivan himself acted the same way many times in his life – with the accused brought before him he reduced them to facts on paper and did not see them as individuals, he got married for it was expected of a man of his station and chose a bride not out of love or devotion but out of the social status it will benefit him. In the end, the story teaches that material wealth and position in society are not what matters. In the face of death, one looks back at the quality of life that he has led, and the most precious times would be the ones he felt most alive, when he was free and himself. The Death of Ivan Ilych and Madame Bovary teach us the nature of man as susceptible to fantasies of the happiness that wealth and material possessions can bring, but in reality these are more likely to corrupt us than give us real happiness. The nature of man is that of desire – desire to achieve in all aspects of life, and in this man should always apply himself to make himself a better person. However, desire for achievement is different from greed. Achievement should not only be limited to the professional and material aspects of life, but more importantly to the relationships with others. The meaning and purpose of life is not about the material achievement but how well one lived his life. Man’s nature reflects that of his society, and society that of man, as the individual is part of the whole and the whole consists of its parts. Both protagonists were deeply influenced by their time and what was regarded as important then. They have let others dictate, influence and take advantage of them, and by not taking responsibility d control over their lives they eventually found themselves in situations they did not dream of. This could have only come up to those who did not examine their actions and the kind of life they lead. Emma and Ivan believed that wealth and material things can bring happiness, but they both ended up dead – although here the stories’ protagonists differ. Whereas Emma chooses suicide to escape her suffering, Ivan comes to terms with his death and accepts it. Although Emma’s final act was of her own decision, we cannot say that she was finally taking things in her hands as before that she was always feeling hindered and trapped by her circumstances. She did not have a realization of what brought down her downfall, even in her final days she did not know what held meaning and not. Her suicide, like all her actions before, was an attempt at escaping reality, and this time she succeeded. Emma was not able to redeem herself, nor was she able to see what would make her life happy, but Ivan was changed and in his last days was able to make sense of his suffering. Tolstoy showed that no matter how sullen or materialistic a man behaved and lived, there is still hope for him to change as long as he lives. That man’s innate nature is towards living an authentic life, towards goodness, and that even if society is corrupt and superficial, pure love and humanity also exists, and it is always within us, and also in our capacity, to choose what kind of life to lead.

Comparing Canada and America Essay example -- Canada America Culture C

Comparing Canada and America The controversy over Canada and America, and who takes after whom has been around for many years. Canada and America are puzzles, two countries that are home to millions of people, living in relative comfort and health. We both have become nations through the help of each other and other nations. Yet, Canada has its own identity as a delightful complexity of cultures and customs, government and heroes. On the other hand, Canadians are simply not Americans by government and technology. Canada’s own identity starts with our remarkable sense of culture and customs. For the native peoples, the Canadian identity stretches thousands of years into the search of struggles to retain elements of their ancient culture. From a colonial perspective, the traditions which surface in Canadian culture seem to be born of an earlier time, of different origins and places, of old-fashioned rituals, and customs. Unlike the United States, its senior neighbor, Canada’s aged-like identity is more reserved and skillful, unwilling to commit it self to anything specific. Within each region of Canada- North, South, East, West and Central- there are definite qualities that detach Prairie from Maritimes, Ontario from Quebec and the Territories from the British Columbia. Each of these regions are separated by how they live, and their different culture background. Which forms our own identites within the counrty. Canadian and American government also show difference in how they govern themselves. United States is a country of one basic language. It has one main language, for its federal government and for every state. Canada is a country of two basic languages, French and English. A second basic difference between our Constitution and the American is that we are a constitutional monarchy and they are republics. For we have a parliamentary-cabinet government, while the Americans have a presidential-congressional. This means that the president is the head of the state and head of the government. While in Canada the Governor General is head of the provinces and the Prime Minister is the head of the government. Parliamentary-cabinet government is based on a concentration of powers. The Prime Minister must by custom be a member of one House or the other, or get a seat in the House. In the United States, the President and every other member of both houses are e... ... do. We are the unknown country to all other nations because Canada has not been a troublesome country. We do not have violent revolutions and we do not invade other people’s lands. A law-abiding nation does not get in the headlines very much. We are proud of our past heritage and have gained great respect from all other nations. Our land also contributes to our own identity. It is a celebration of the beauty and love of our landscapes. Without out our own identity, we would be like all other nations, fighting for our needs. Every nation would be alike, and tourism would not be a big attraction to our nation. We have a very rich and diverse heritage. Everywhere around us is our heritage. Our government, language, customs and habits, music, books and a wide variety of scientific inventions are gifts to us from our ancestors who lived in Canada. But, the influence of our heritage has been shaped by the influence of United States and many other nations. The histories of these nations have helped us become the country that it is today. Everyone living in Canada is lucky to have a great country, without many problems. I think, it is not hard to say that everyone is proud Canadian.

Assessment Tools

Running head: 1 Assessment Tools Analysis Paper Tricia E Topping University of Phoenix NUR/440 Karen Harriman April 16, 2012 Assessment Tools Analysis Paper 11/13/12 8:13 PM http://www. scribd. com/doc/104725000/Assessment-Tools-Analysis-Paper Page 2 of 12 April 16, 2012 2 Assessment Tools Analysis Paper Assessment tools are used in nursing to enhance the overall assessment phase of the nursing process. The assessment tools that I have selected to analyze are: The Spiritual Well- Being Scale (SWBS), The Hassles and Uplifts Inventory, and The Well Being Picture Scale (WBPS).After describing each tool and it’s benefits within the nursing process, I will apply them to the vulnerable population of person’s with Down syndrome. Spiritual Well-Being Scale â€Å"The Spiritual Well-Being Scale (SWBS) is a general indicator of perceived well- being† (lifeadvance. com). During its creation by doctors Ellison and Paloutzian, they found a need for Assessment Tools Analysis Pa per 11/13/12 8:13 PM http://www. scribd. com/doc/104725000/Assessment-Tools-Analysis-Paper Page 3 of 12 people to be able to describe their thoughts on spirituality in their own terms.This concept gives spiritual followers a greater sense of self worth and a reason to continue their spiritual beliefs. It also gives purpose to the congregation and individual members for continuing to spread the message of their beliefs to others. Having the ability to believe in a higher being, to talk and pray to this entity, empowers a person beyond normal daily activities. It allows for the creation of self peace and guidance in times of trouble. â€Å"Being religious or having spiritual beliefs has been linked to improved health and well-being in several empirical studies† (Grow et. ll). The SWBS is inexpensive tool and can be utilized by any person or population. It is very simple to use, is self-administered and takes between 10-15 minutes. â€Å"It is a paper and pencil survey currentl y available in both English and Spanish†¦ and was designed to assess people’s perception of their own spiritual well-being† (lifeadvance. com). The SWBS can be used by nurses within the assessment process to help guide and show a patient’s level of spiritual well- 3 being.A higher level of spiritual well-being can be associated with improved health and better recognition of self limitations and spiritual peace if faced with a life threatening diagnosis. As the SWBS is a simple tool, it would be effective for a health care worker to use with a high functioning adult with Down syndrome. With slight modification to questions for ease of understanding, and possible verbal presentation, a health care provider could present the tools and interpret the results as with any other adult.The community in which one worships acts as a support system for it’s members. Many families with children affected by Downs or similar disorders turn to a spiritual community f or support and acceptance. These communities assist to foster the growth of the child into a spiritual adult, giving them a better sense of self worth, a Assessment positive belief in a higher power, and a functional place within a small population. Because of this, the SWBS can be an effective tool to enhance the assessment of an adult Downs patient.Hassles and Uplifts Scales The Hassles and Uplifts Scales (HSUP) were created as a more positive approach to recognizing daily stressors in our lives. A modification of the Hassles scale, the HSUP is a combination of the Hassles scale with 117 items identifying life’s stressors, and the Uplifts scales including 135 items identifying daily positive encounters. The HSUP contains â€Å"fifty-three items worked so that the respondent can indicate whether a given transaction is a hassle, uplift, or both† (Lazarus & Folkman, 2011).By combining the two scales, a positive emphasis was placed on daily activities, rather than focusi ng on the negative stressors of the Hassles scale. â€Å"The Uplifts scale suggests how positive aspects of daily life counteract the damaging effects of stress† (Lazarus & Folkman, 2011). Brought together in the HSUP scale, the positive influences 4 and negative effects of stressors in a person’s daily life can be identified. If the negative stressors are prevalent, it is then within the power of the individual to increase the number of uplifting events while decreasing or overcoming the stressors.This information is very useful to identify while performing a health assessment. If a patient is found to have an overwhelming number of stressors or hassles and few to little uplifts, their emotional and physical well-being could be compromised. Too many negative stressors can lead to an inability to cope and cause damaging effect. Assisting a patient to identify both stressors and uplifts can allow them to develop their own coping mechanisms as well as introduce more posi tive interactions throughout Assessment Tools Analysis Paper 11/13/12 8:13 PM ttp://www. scribd. com/doc/104725000/Assessment-Tools-Analysis-Paper Page 5 of 12 their day. The HSUP is also an inexpensive and simple tool that can be performed during a health care assessment and take approximately 10 minutes for an adult to complete. By identifying the 53 phrases as either a hassle or uplift and giving each a numerical value from 0-3, the test can be scored quickly providing immediate results for the patient. This is important because is allows the nurse to quickly recognize positive and negative influences.The patient can then be made aware of the outcome. This allows the patient and nurse or health care provider to collaborate together to balance out the hassles and increase the uplifting experiences. The HSUP, like the SWBS, can be easily used in assessments of higher functioning adults with Downs. If needed, slight modification to the 0-3 numerical rating can be done. Instead of as signing a number to an uplift or hassle, the patient could more easily identify a positive or negative experience in their daily activities.By then focusing on the uplifting/positive experiences, a patient with Downs could recognize the experiences that create happiness, learning to try and experience these more often. This assessment tool can also be used easily by members of the patient’s family to assist them in identifying situations that cause increased stress. Assisting the family in recognizing Developers / API Legal Terms Privacy Copyright  © Copyright 2012 Scribd Inc. Language: English